enzyme kinetics mixed model inhibition curve fitting algorithm (GraphPad Software Inc)
Structured Review
![Structures of the compounds are shown in Panels A-C: A, Flu-AM1; B, Ibu-AM5; C, ibufenac-AM1. The asterisks show the chiral centres. In Panels D-F, the <t>inhibition</t> of 0.5 μM [ 3 H]AEA hydrolysis in rat brain homogenates by the compounds is shown. Data are means ± SEM (when not enclosed by the symbols), N = 3 for the enantiomers of D, Flu-AM1; E, Ibu-AM5 and F, racemic Ibu-AM5 and Ibufenac-AM1.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_3906/pmc04643906/pmc04643906__pone.0142711.g001.jpg)
Enzyme Kinetics Mixed Model Inhibition Curve Fitting Algorithm, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enzyme kinetics mixed model inhibition curve fitting algorithm/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Interaction of the N -(3-Methylpyridin-2-yl)amide Derivatives of Flurbiprofen and Ibuprofen with FAAH: Enantiomeric Selectivity and Binding Mode"
Article Title: Interaction of the N -(3-Methylpyridin-2-yl)amide Derivatives of Flurbiprofen and Ibuprofen with FAAH: Enantiomeric Selectivity and Binding Mode
Journal: PLoS ONE
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142711
Figure Legend Snippet: Structures of the compounds are shown in Panels A-C: A, Flu-AM1; B, Ibu-AM5; C, ibufenac-AM1. The asterisks show the chiral centres. In Panels D-F, the inhibition of 0.5 μM [ 3 H]AEA hydrolysis in rat brain homogenates by the compounds is shown. Data are means ± SEM (when not enclosed by the symbols), N = 3 for the enantiomers of D, Flu-AM1; E, Ibu-AM5 and F, racemic Ibu-AM5 and Ibufenac-AM1.
Techniques Used: Inhibition
Figure Legend Snippet: Species-dependent inhibition of FAAH by the enantiomers of Flu-AM1 and Ibu-AM5.
Techniques Used: Inhibition
Figure Legend Snippet: Panels A and B show the time-dependencies of ( R )-Flu-AM1 and URB597, respectively. The data are means ± SEM, N = 3. In Panel C, homogenates (at 20-fold normal strength) were preincubated with either vehicle, 2, 4 or 6 μM ( R )-Flu-AM1 for 60 min. Aliquots were then diluted 20-fold and assayed for FAAH activity. These are shown as 2 →0.1, 4 →0.2 and 6 →0.3. Concomitantly, ( R )-Flu-AM1 was added to vehicle-preincubated aliquots to give concentrations of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 μM (representing free concentrations after a 20- fold dilution), 2, 4 and 6 μM final concentrations. The panel shows the data as % of corresponding control (means ± SEM, N = 3). For a fully reversible compound, the inhibition seen in the yellow bars (i.e. following the dilution) should be lower than in the purple bars (the inhibition seen at the undiluted concentrations) but equal to the green bars (the free concentrations after the dilution).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Control, Inhibition
Figure Legend Snippet: ( R )-Flu-AM1 and B. carprofen. Samples were incubated for 18 h with inhibitor and substrate (0.5 μM [ 3 H]AEA). The concentrations of lysates used were FAAH wt , 0.04 μg/assay, FAAH T488A , 0.4 μg/assay, empty vector 0.36 μg/assay. Shown are means ± SEM, N = 3–6. The pI 50 values, with corresponding IC 50 and n H values in brackets were: ( R )-Flu-AM1: FAAH wt , 5.08±0.03 (8.3 μM; n H = 1.02±0.07); FAAH T488A , 4.55±0.07 (28 μM; n H = 1.47±0.37), FAAH wt + empty vector, 5.10±0.02 (8.0 μM; n H = 0.99±0.06). Carprofen: FAAH wt , 4.43±0.02 (37 μM, n H = 3.00±0.31); FAAH T488A , 4.32±0.04 (48 μM, n H = 2.43±0.37), FAAH wt + empty vector, 4.50±0.01 (32 μM; n H = 4.28±0.41. Note that for carprofen and wild-type FAAH, the analyses suggested that a curve with a maximum inhibition of 82–91% fitted the data better than a curve with 100% maximum inhibition, and these values have been used here.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Plasmid Preparation, Inhibition